Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Vasquez v. York et al
as 2:2023cv01406
Plaintiff:
Luis Vasquez
Defendant:
Ann York, Chrystal Marchant, Mark Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knaus v. Wilcox et al
as 1:2023cv01309
Plaintiff:
Russell Dale Knaus
Defendant:
Timmothy Grandson, Redgranite Correctional Institution, Sgt Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Ronald Walker
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Doe #1 et al
as 2:2022cv00791
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Detric Lewis
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holman v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Thomas Holman
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Kevin Carr, New Lisbon Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bahling v. Fuller et al
as 2:2021cv00304
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Dr Fuller, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob J Bahling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Lucas et al
as 2:2020cv01619
Defendant:
Deputy Inspector John Doe, LT John Doe, Arnell R Lucas and others
Plaintiff:
Demetric Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Verheyen et al
as 2:2019cv01033
Defendant:
Lt D Verheyen, John Doe #5, John Doe #4 and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian D'Wayne Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarado v. Beahm et al
as 2:2018cv01588
Defendant:
Joseph Beahm, Andrew Pohl, Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Doe et al
as 2:2018cv01512
Defendant:
Lt John Doe, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Javon Holy Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
