Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Small v. Fidelity Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00706
Plaintiff:
William Small
Defendant:
Fidelity Inc., John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jarvis v. May et al
as 1:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Michael Jarvis
Defendant:
Warden Robert May, Commissioner Claire DeMatteis, Captain Bruce Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wenzke v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01146
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wenzke
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc., John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thorn v. New Castle County et al
as 1:2021cv01024
Plaintiff:
Timothy Thorn
Defendant:
New Castle County, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nix v. New Castle County et al
as 1:2021cv00590
Defendant:
New Castle County, Officer John Doe 3, New Castle County Department of Public Safety and others
Plaintiff:
Lakeisha Afiah Nix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kokinda v. Koch Industries Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01531
Plaintiff:
Jason Kokinda
Defendant:
Koch Industries Inc., Tom Wolf, William R. Stoycos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rossman v. Harvey et al
as 1:2016cv00018
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossman
Defendant:
G. Michael Harvey, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gibbs v. Coupe et al
as 1:2014cv00790
Plaintiff:
Arson I. Gibbs, Sr.
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, David Pierce, Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Celorio v. On Demand Books LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00821
Plaintiff:
Victor Manuel Celorio
Defendant:
On Demand Books LLC, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Monroe v. Klein et al
as 1:2012cv00723
Plaintiff:
Charles Thomas Monroe
Defendant:
Christopher Klein, Natasha Hollingsworth, Michael Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
