Cases 31 - 40 of 8,940
Encarnacion v. Collado
as 24-911
Defendant:
VITARIUS, C.O.; Shawangunk Correctional Facility, Vitarious, OLIVO, C.O.; Shawangunk Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
BERNABE ENCARNACION
Gibbs v. Utilization Review Committee
as 24-891
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIBBS
Defendant:
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FEDUS, Dr., PILLAI, Dr. and others
Ezekwo v. St. Philip Neri
as 24-892
Plaintiff:
Dr. IFEOMA EZEKWO
Defendant:
ST. PHILIP NERI CATHOLIC CHURCH, Bronx, New York, RICHARD COPPOLA, Esq., Rev. Msgr JOSEPH P. LAMORTE and others
Banas v. WLCC Lending FDL et al
as 1:2024cv02770
Defendant:
Raycen Raines, III, WLCC Lending FDL doing business as Fast Day Loans, Wakpamni Lake Community Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Banas
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kotler v. Torres
as 24-879
Plaintiff:
KERRY KOTLER
Defendant:
PEDRO TORRES, DAISY RODRIGUEZ, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Soley v. County of Nassau
as 24-880
Plaintiff:
EAN SOLEY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF NASSAU, NASSAU COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, P.O. OMAR D. GALAN, Shield 3660 and others
Cunningham v. Lupis
as 24-844
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. CUNNINGHAM, SR.
Defendant:
FRANCESCO LUPIS, Dr., COLLEEN GALLAGHER, RUDY ALVAREZ and others
Shomo v. State of New York
as 24-818
Plaintiff:
JOSE SHOMO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, STEWART ECKERT, Superintendent, individually and in official capacity and others
Doe #1 (ELA) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (ELA), John Doe #2 (BMA), John Doe #3 (RNB) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Iraheta v. Doe (1) et al
as 4:2024cv01163
Plaintiff:
Jose D. Iraheta
Defendant:
John Doe (1), John Doe (2), John Doe (3) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
