Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Robinson et al v. Strickland-Saffold et al
as 1:2020cv01330
Defendant:
Atty. Justin Weatherly, Ofc. John Doe 5, Ofc. John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Robinson, Maiya McCoy and Martin Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pullen v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2020cv00198
Defendant:
Tiffany Caldwell, John Doe, Keith Booker and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Tyrone Pullen, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Erdos et al
as 1:2020cv00120
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Annette Chambers-Smith, Barney and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius L. Harris
Interested Party:
State of Ohio, Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstead v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2019cv04857
Defendant:
Dep Carmen, Sgt. Obrien, Nurse Jane Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Demarco Armstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. Cuyahoga County et al
as 1:2019cv02411
Defendant:
Barry Hickerson, Cuyahoga County, Beverly Witt and others
Plaintiff:
Corrionne Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kilkenny v. Gabriel et al
as 2:2019cv03661
Defendant:
Ethan Dorr, John Doe #1, Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
James Preston Kilkenny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malenda v. Gray
as 2:2019cv00167
Defendant:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution, Jane/John Doe 2-13 and David Gray
Plaintiff:
Greg Malenda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pullen v. SOCF Mail Room et al
as 1:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
Terry Tyrone Pullen, Jr
Defendant:
SOCF Mail Room, Whitman, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Mohr et al
as 2:2015cv01616
Plaintiff:
Mark M. Long
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Eddy, Elliott Neufeld and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendricks v. Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2014cv01890
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Hendricks
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners, Frank Bova, Midwest Medical Staffing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
