Cases 1 - 10 of 381
Hehl v. Belk, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Bryan E. Hehl
Defendant:
Belk, Inc. and John Does 1 and 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Wayne v. Hawes et al
as 7:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Robert James Wayne
Defendant:
Spencer Hawes, Kyle Irving, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe et al v. MasterCorp Inc.
as 1:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Defendant:
MasterCorp Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carter v. Irving, et al.
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
T'von Maurice Carter
Defendant:
Sheriff Antoinette Irving and Deputies John Doe 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winn v. Irving et al
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Trevelle Alexander Winn
Defendant:
Sheriff Antionette Irving and Deputies John Doe 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poisik v. Thompson et al
as 1:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Ari B. Poisik
Defendant:
Ian J. Thompson, Caleb Hubbard, Sean Mleczynski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Wilkins et al v. Rasnake et al
as 7:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Andre Curtis Wilkins
Defendant:
Investigator K. Rasnake, Unit Manager C. Dye, Warden Isreal D. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tamaris (Gibraltar) Limited v. Does 1-9
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED
Defendant:
John Does 1-9
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Polidi v. Mendel et al
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Richard Polidi
Defendant:
Elizabeth U. Mendel, James O. Payne, Michelle K. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
L.M. et al v. Graham et al
as 1:2023cv01574
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
Jonathan Graham, Michelle Smith, John Doe #4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
