Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Abraugh v. Altimus
as 21-30205
Defendant / Appellee: Bradley Vassar, individually & in his official capacity, John Doe #1, Correctional Employee, Bill Altimus, individually & in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Kelsey Rice Abraugh, Reashelle Morrow, on behalf of M A, Karen Abraugh, individually and on behalf of M A and as Administrator, on behalf of Randall Abraugh Estate
Tirado Velez v. City of Colorado Springs, et al
as 21-1137
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO, COLORADO SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT, John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John 3, John 4, John 5, and John 6, BILL ELDER, individually and in his official capacity as an officer of Colorado Springs Police Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ELIEZER MANUEL TIRADO VELEZ, as surviving heir of other Eliezer Tirado-Ortiz
Let Them Play MN, et al v. Tim Walz, et al
as 20-3656
Defendant / Appellee: Minnesota Department of Administration, Governor Tim Walz, in his official capacity, Minnesota Department of Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: John Roe, 3, as parent and guardian of John Roe 4, a minor, Jane Doe, 1, both individually and as parent and guardian of Jane Doe 2 and John Roe 1, minors, Jane Doe, 5 and others
Joe Roberts, Jr. v. Vilma Khounphixay, et al
as 20-36014
Defendant: JANA ROBISON, JOHN DOES, 1 - 3 ; Correctional Officer, sued individually and in his/her official capacity, HEATHER HELMS, Psyche Associate, sued individually and in his/her official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant: VILMA KHOUNPHIXAY, Psyche Associate, sued individually and in his/her official capacity, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff / Appellee: JOE J.W. ROBERTS, Jr.
Ifrah Yassin v. Heather Weyker, et al
as 20-3299
Defendant / Appellee: John Does 1-2, individually and in their official capacities as St. Paul Police Officers, John Does 3-4, individually and in their official capacities as supervisory members of the St. Paul Police Department, Heather Weyker, individually and in her official capacity as a St. Paul Police Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Ifrah Yassin
ESPADA v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al
as 1:2019cv06488
Plaintiff: JULIO CESAR ESPADA
Defendant: CITY OF NEW YORK, POLICE OFFICER ESPADA, Police Officers John Doe 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
William Mann v. Henry Joseph, et al
as 19-13110
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAM MANN
Defendant / Appellee: CLAYTON COUNTY, GA., MICHAEL WATTS, Individually and in Official Capacity as Clayton County Police Officer, HENRY ADRIAN JOSEPH, Individually and in Official Capacity as Clayton County Police Officer and others
Brock v. The City Of New York
as 19-646
Defendant / Appellee: Police Officer Salvadore Diaz, Shield No. 21953, Individually and in his official capacity, Doctor Alan Dudley Labor, Individually and in his official capacity, Doctor Herman Anderson, Individually and in his official capacity and others
Defendant: City of New York, John Doe 1-3, New York City Police Officers; Individually; and in their official capacities; the name John Doe being fictitious as the real names are not presently known, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Kamilah Brock
McCollough v. Hale
as 19-296
Defendant: Detective Louis Scarcella, Correctional Officer R. Allen, E. Williams and others
Defendant / Appellee: Thomas Griffin, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility
Plaintiff / Appellant: Michael McCollough
SOTO v. CITY OF PATERSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv11311
Defendant: ABC ENTITIES 1-5, CITY OF PATERSON, CHIEF OF POLICE TROY OSWALD, in his personal, individual and official capacities, and others
Plaintiff: YOLANDA SOTO, individually and as proposed Administratrix of the ESTATE OF XAVIER CUEVAS-SOTO, ADRIANNA SOTO, YOLANDA SOTO
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?