Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CAPITAL HITCH SERVICE INC v HILL
as 4:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
CAPITAL HITCH SERVICE INC
Defendant:
DEWAYNE HILL and JOHN DOES I 10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
DOE et al v. AUSTIN et al
as 3:2021cv01211
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, I, JOHN 2 DOE, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Defendant:
Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, III, Secretary U.S. DHS Xavier Becerra, Secretary Air Force Frank Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv60455
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Coffman et al v. Ally Financial, Inc., et al
as 3:2020cv00325
Defendant:
John Does I-X, Ally Financial, Inc. and Ally Bank Corp.
Plaintiff:
Michael Coffman and April Coffman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Strange v. Public Reputation Management Services, LLC et al
as 9:2019cv81026
Defendant:
Benzion Aboud, John Doe I, ELEV8TE LLC. and others
Plaintiff:
Clinton Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Antonio Carrizosa, et al v. Chiquita Brands International,, et al
as 19-11494
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIQUITA FRESH NORTH AMERICA LLC and CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANA FRANCISCA PALAC MORENO, JOHN DOE #3, JOHN DOE, I and others
Mantel v. Mantel et al
as 1:2018cv04005
Plaintiff:
Shelly Mantel
Defendant:
John Does, I-V, Siemens Corporation and Yorav Mantel
Lovera v. Nationwide Bank
as 0:2018cv61007
Plaintiff:
Arnaldo Lovera
Defendant:
Nationwide Bank and John Does I-X
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
