Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Debeikes v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00504
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Debeikes
Defendant:
Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. , Association of Flight Attendants and John Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Goyne v. American Home Mortgage Acceptance, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00765
Plaintiff:
Michael David Goyne
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Acceptance, Inc., American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. , American Home Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mailo v. Crail et al
as 1:2011cv00566
Plaintiff:
Paulo Mailo, Jr.
Defendant:
Adams Crail, Shirley Pico, Carla V. Kekauoha and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Cadiz et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 1:2011cv00194
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Cadiz and Noraliza Cadiz
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP , Bank of America, NA , Bank of America Home Retention Division and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Scher v. SFTP et al
as 1:2009cv00482
Plaintiff:
Greg Scher
Defendant:
SFTP, David Roemer, Norman Corley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ramos, et al v. Great Hawaiian Prope, et al
as 1:2001cv00057
Plaintiff:
Julianne E. Miller, Roberto Ramos and Julianne E. Blum
Defendant:
Great Hawaiian Properties Corporation a foreign corporation doing business as American Hawaii Cruises, American Classic Voyages Co., John Does 1 Through 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
