Cases 41 - 50 of 90
Farris v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv05163
Plaintiff:
Doris A. Farris
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLeod v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv05058
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, American Medical Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Linda F. McLeod
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv05048
Plaintiff:
Mary L. Moore
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphree v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv05051
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Murphree
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Slemp v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv05056
Plaintiff:
Rita G. Slemp
Defendant:
Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Ethicon, Inc. , Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allgood v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2012cv05055
Plaintiff:
Sandra K. Allgood
Defendant:
Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffin v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04975
Plaintiff:
Harriet Cammile Griffin
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crook v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04998
Plaintiff:
Sandra Jordan Crook
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sellers v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04964
Plaintiff:
Penny Gladys Sellers
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04965
Plaintiff:
Tammy Irene Phillips
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
