Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
DOE v. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv03947
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, SCHOOL REFORM COMMISSION OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, CATHERINE A. BLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOLFGRAMM v. COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL 13301 et al
as 2:2019cv03701
Plaintiff:
ROSAMUND A. WOLFGRAMM
Defendant:
BETH NORTON, COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA DISTRICT 2-13, DENNIS EICHFELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DERRICK et al v. GLEN MILLS SCHOOLS et al
as 2:2019cv01541
Plaintiff:
DERRICK, WALTER, THOMAS and others
Defendant:
RANDY IRESON, CHESTER COUNTY INTERMEDIATE UNIT, JOHN DOES 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORTAZZO v. CITY OF READING et al
as 5:2014cv02513
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CORTAZZO
Defendant:
CITY OF READING , WILLIAM M. HEIM , MADISON WINCHESTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. AR RESOURCES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv07432
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LEWIS
Defendant:
AR RESOURCES, INC., JOHN DOES 1-20 and XYZ CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KURIAN v. THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER et al
as 2:2007cv03482
Plaintiff:
SAJAN KURIAN and MICHAEL RHODES
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER , THE LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON BOARD and JOHN DOES 1-20
Respondent:
JEREMIAH SCHAFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2006cv03396
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID JONES
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, ROBERT FERWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
