Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-15007
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-17076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-56073
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lorenzo v. Figueroa et al
as 3:2017cv01493
Plaintiff:
Elisio Atenia Lorenzo
Defendant:
Figueroa, John F. Kelly, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Navichoque v. Kelly et al
as 5:2017cv03578
Petitioner:
Gustavo Navichoque
Defendant:
John F. Kelly, Jefferson B. Sessions, III, David W. Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01161
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taskov v. Sessions III et al
as 2:2017cv01587
Respondent:
Terrence M Jackson, John F. Kelly, Angela S Ketchum and others
Petitioner:
Dragomir Taskov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Valenzuela Palomar v. Sessions, III et al
as 1:2017at00362
Petitioner:
Arturo Valenzuela Palomar
Defendant:
Jeffrey B Sessions, III, John F Kelly and Craig Meyer
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00877
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jane Doe, et al v. John Kelly, et al
as 17-15383
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JANE DOE, # 1, JANE DOE, # 2 and NORLAN FLORES, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN F. KELLY, Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner, United States Customs and Border Protection, RONALD VITIELLO, Chief, United States Border Patrol and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
