Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Cruz v. IBM Corporation, et al
as 19-1963
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM LAFFERTY, Lowell PD Detective, DAVID RUDE, IBM Manager, JOHN F. AKERS, IBM Chairman and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS A. CRUZ
Bunch, et al v. W.R. Grace & Co.,, et al
as 08-1406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE BUNCH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and on behalf of the W.R. Grace & Co. Savings and Investment Plan, JERRY L. HOWARD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and on behalf of the W.R. Grace & Co. Savings and Investment Plan and DAVID MUELLER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and on behalf of the W.R. Grace & Co. Employee Savings and Investment Plan and the Grace Stock Fund
Plaintiff:
KERI EVANS, on behalf of herself and a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
W.R. GRACE & CO.,, W. R. GRACE & CO. - CONN., ROBERT M. TAROLA and others
Defendant:
FIDELITY MANAGEMENT, BRENDA GOTTLIEB, W. BRIAN MCGOWAN and others
Siamis v. Akers et al
as 1:2008cv10193
Plaintiff:
Mark Siamis
Defendant:
John F. Akers, Ronald C. Cambre, Marye Anne Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Evans, et al v. Akers, et al
as 07-1140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KERI EVANS, on behalf of herself and a class of all others similarly situated and TIMOTHY WHIPPS, on behalf of himself and a class of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE BUNCH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and on behalf of the W.R. Grace & Co. Employee, JERRY L. HOWARD and DAVID MUELLER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and on behalf of the W.R. Grace & Co. Employee Savings and Investment Plan and the Grace Stock Fund
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN F. AKERS, RONALD C. CAMBRE, MARYE ANNE FOX and others
Defendant:
FIDELITY MANAGEMENT, STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, STATE STREET GLOBAL ADVISORS and others
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
