Cases
James v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv01077
Defendant: City of New York, Sergeant Ignazio Conca, Detective John Fahim and others
Plaintiff: Clinton James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2016cv00845
Defendant: P.O. Christopher Bruno, Daniel Byrne, Ignazio Conca and others
Plaintiff: Kenneth Smith and Rylawn Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patterson v. The City Of New York , et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv05330
Plaintiff: Christian Patterson
Defendant: The City Of New York , , John Fahim and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akoto v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv01189
Plaintiff: Paul Akoto
Defendant: Michael Brooks, City of New York, Ignazio Conca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hines v. City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv03687
Defendant: City of New York, Police Officer John Fahim and John and Jane Doe 2-10
Plaintiff: Ricardo Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duncan et al v. City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01565
Defendant: Frank Aliffi, Bruce Ceparano, City of New York and others
Plaintiff: Ebony Duncan, Breyon Gray, Deborah Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Castillo et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv00752
Plaintiff: Linette Castillo, Mike Castillo, L.C.#1 and others
Defendant: P.O. John Fahim, P.O. John Jane Does #1-10, Sgt. Chernyavsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith et al v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2011cv01615
Defendant: City Of New York, John Fahim and John and Jane Doe 1 Through 10
Plaintiff: Richard Edwards, Charles Smith and Abdul Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?