Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Clarence Dace v. Kristina Skeens, et al
as 20-2924
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN GARLICK, Psychologist/Committee Member, RANDY PFISTER, KRISTINA SKEENS, Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLARENCE DACE
Nathaniel Jackson v. Alton Angus, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1736
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL P. MELVIN, JOHN GARLICK, ALTON ANGUS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATHANIEL JACKSON
Clarence Dace v. Kristina Skeens, et al
as 19-1015
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN GARLICK, Psychologist/Committee Member, RANDY PFISTER, KRISTINA SKEENS, Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLARENCE DACE
Taylor v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv01013
Plaintiff: Kennado K Taylor
Defendant: Illinois Department of Corrections, SA Godinez, . Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Dempse et al
as 1:2017cv01012
Plaintiff: Kennado Taylor
Defendant: . Dempse, . Thomas, John Garlick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerald Jones v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 16-2270
Plaintiff - Appellant: GERALD JONES
Defendant - Appellee: RANDY PFISTER, GUY PIERCE, JOHN GARLICK, Supervisor Administrator of Mental Health and others
McCauley v. Wade et al
as 1:2016cv00504
Plaintiff: Howard McCauley
Defendant: Matthew Wade, Larry Amerson, John Garlick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Varner v. Amerson et al
as 1:2016cv00405
Plaintiff: DeAndre Varner
Defendant: Larry Amerson, Mathew Wade, John Garlick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Best v. Wade et al
as 1:2016cv00391
Plaintiff: Bryan R Best
Defendant: Matthew Wade, John Garlick, Eric Star and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Amerson et al
as 1:2016cv00365
Plaintiff: Ronnell Thomas
Defendant: Larry Amerson, Mathew Wade, John Garlick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?