Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jones v. Edwards et al
as 3:2016cv00704
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards, Attorney General Jeff Landry and Jimmy Smith
Plaintiff:
John H. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00679
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Petitioner:
John H. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Cain et al
as 3:2013cv00758
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
John H. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Butler et al
as 3:2013cv00486
Defendant:
Trent Burton, Unknown Butler, Unknown Callahan and others
Plaintiff:
John H. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Menzina et al
as 3:2013cv00182
Defendant:
Perry Dixon, Nathaniel Johnson, Chad Menzina and others
Plaintiff:
John H. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Fontenot
as 3:2011cv00848
Defendant:
Cathy Fontenot
Plaintiff:
John H. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Cain et al
as 3:2011cv00161
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Petitioner:
John H. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Cain et al
as 3:2011cv00099
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Petitioner:
John H. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones et al v. Fontenot et al
as 3:2010cv00806
Defendant:
John Calvert, Correctional Officers at Camp J and Cathy Fontenot
Plaintiff:
Willie Foley, John H. Jones and Levon Pinesett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. West Baton Rouge Parish et al
as 3:2010cv00411
Plaintiff:
John H. Jones
Defendant:
West Baton Rouge Parish and West Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.