Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Hughes v. King
as 0:2010cv00450
Petitioner:
Robert Michael Hughes
Respondent:
John King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albert Brown Lurks, Jr. v. Joan Fabian, et al
as 10-1320
Petitioner - Appellant:
Albert Brown Lurks, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
Joan Fabian, Minnesota Commissioner of Corrections and John King, Warden of Stillwater Prison
Ligons v. King et al
as 0:2010cv00180
Petitioner:
Ronaldo S Ligons and Ronaldo S Ligons
Respondent:
John King, John King, Stillwater Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ashby v. Fabian et al
as 0:2009cv01765
Petitioner:
Theodore Sherman Ashby
Respondent:
Joan Fabian and John King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Quick v. King
as 0:2009cv01660
Petitioner:
Jon Earl Quick
Respondent:
John King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Brooks v. King
as 0:2009cv01388
Petitioner:
Marlowe Nathaniel Brooks
Respondent:
John King and John King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Staples v. King
as 0:2009cv00987
Petitioner:
Donald L. Staples
Respondent:
John King, John King and Tara C Ferguson Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Philip Randall Vance v. John King, et al
as 09-1656
Petitioner - Appellant:
Philip Randall Vance
Respondent - Appellee:
John King and Lori Swanson, Attorney General of Minnesota
Lurks v. Fabian et al
as 0:2009cv00681
Petitioner:
Albert Brown Lurks, Jr.
Respondent:
Joan Fabian and John King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spann v. King
as 0:2009cv00542
Petitioner:
Joseph Thomas Spann
Respondent:
John King and John King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
