Cases 1 - 10 of 14
John Schoppe-Rico v. Gary Swarthout
as 13-73969
Petitioner:
JOHN M. SCHOPPE-RICO
Respondent:
GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden
John Schoppe-Rico v. Robert Horel, et al
as 12-17302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN M. SCHOPPE-RICO
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT A. HOREL, Warden, FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, Warden, P. T. SMITH and others
John Schoppe-Rico v. J. Rupert, et al
as 12-17300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN M. SCHOPPE-RICO
Defendant - Appellee:
J. L. RUPERT, Procurement and Service Officer II, J. VAN VALKENBERG, Correctional Business Manager I, C. WILLIAMS, Supervisor and others
John Schoppe-Rico v. J. Rupert, et al
as 12-16225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN M. SCHOPPE-RICO
Defendant - Appellee:
J. L. RUPERT, Procurement and Service Officer II, J. VAN VALKENBERG, Correctional Business Manager I, C. WILLIAMS, Supervisor and others
John Schoppe-Rico v. Robert Horel, et al
as 12-15800
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN M. SCHOPPE-RICO
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT A. HOREL, Warden, FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, Warden, P. T. SMITH and others
Schoppe-Rico v. Rupert et al
as 3:2011cv04283
Plaintiff:
John M. Schoppe-Rico
Defendant:
J. L. Rupert, J. Van Valkenburg, C. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schoppe-Rico v. Horel et al
as 3:2011cv02809
Plaintiff:
John M. Schoppe-Rico
Defendant:
Robert A. Horel, Francisco Jacquez, P.T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Schoppe-Rico v. Littlemon, et al
as 11-16271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN M. SCHOPPE-RICO
Defendant - Appellee:
LITTLEMON, J. METCALFE, E. C. MCKELLEP and others
Schoppe-Rico v. Lopez et al
as 1:2011cv00523
Plaintiff:
John M. Schoppe-Rico
Defendant:
Lopez, A - Rosenthal and A. B. Buenafe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schoppe-Rico v. Lopez et al
as 3:2011cv01268
Plaintiff:
John M. Schoppe-Rico
Defendant:
Lopez, A. Rosenthal and Buenafe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
