Cases 31 - 40 of 41
BABBS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03154
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DUDLEY, DAVID KNAPP, JOHN TITUS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MARTIN v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv02846
Plaintiff:
JOHN MARTIN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burrell v. Armor Correctional Health Services Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv62007
Plaintiff:
Karin Burrell
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services Inc., Stanley Frankowitz, John Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Martins v. United States of America
as 0:2016cv63025
Plaintiff:
John Martins
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kaether v. Armor Correctional Health Services Inc. et al
as 0:2016cv62950
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Kaether
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services Inc., Sheriff of Broward County, Stanley Frankowitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spaulding v. USA
as 3:2016cv00841
Petitioner:
John Martin Spaulding
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Edwards et al v. Armor Correctional Health Services Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv61577
Plaintiff:
Ceaniel Edwards , James Priester , Raleigh Priester, Jr and others
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services Inc., Scott Israel, John Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. Therma-Tru Corp
as 6:2013cv00027
Plaintiff:
John Martin
Defendant:
Therma-Tru Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Newton v. City of Stuart, Florida et al
as 2:2012cv14330
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Lee Newton
Defendant:
City of Stuart, Florida, Stuart Police Department, Edward Morley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
