Cases 1 - 10 of 11
John v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10035
Plaintiff:
Russo Michael John and John Michael Russo
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc., Covidien LTD, Covidien Plc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goss et al v. Voispot, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv40152
Plaintiff:
John Michael Goss and M.D. Thomas P Goss
Defendant:
Voispot, Inc. and John D Hodgeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Burmeister v John Michael Barrows, et al.
as 1:2021cv12139
Plaintiff:
Chad Burmeister, Chad Michael Barrows and J. Barrows LLC
Defendant:
J. Barrows LLC doing business as JB Sales and John Michael Barrows
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Conformis, Inc. v. AETNA, Inc., et al.
as 1:2020cv10890
Plaintiff:
Conformis, Inc. and John Michael Schaub
Defendant:
AETNA, Inc., and Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Anderson v. DXC Technology Services LLC et al
as 1:2019cv12283
Plaintiff:
David Anderson
Defendant:
DXC Technology Services LLC, Computer Sciences Corporation, John Michael Lawrie and others
Not Yet Classified:
Edward F. Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv13775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Arnstein v. MVM, Inc.
as 1:2012cv10666
Plaintiff:
John H. Arnstein , Gerard R. Ashe , George William Barnet and others
Defendant:
MVM, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kardas v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv11999
Plaintiff:
John Michael Kardas
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Kardas v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv12000
Plaintiff:
John Michael Kardas
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Mowduk v. Astrue
as 3:2010cv30091
Plaintiff:
John Michael Mowduk
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
