Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Thomas v. Palakovich et al
as 3:2011cv02172
Plaintiff:
Daryl Thomas
Defendant:
John Palakovich, Mary Sabol, Doctor Vonkiel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Smith et al
as 1:2010cv01659
Plaintiff:
John Diaz
Defendant:
K. Smith, D Sullivan, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagan v. Beard et al
as 1:2010cv00883
Plaintiff:
Damont Hagan
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Shirley Smeal, James Barnacle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Palakovich et al
as 1:2010cv00462
Petitioner:
Charte Hayes
Respondent:
John Palakovich , Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania and District Attorney of York County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Riley v. Beard et al
as 3:2009cv00230
Plaintiff:
Nathan Riley
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, -, John Palakovich, Harker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baney v. Palakovich
as 4:2008cv01722
Petitioner:
Jeremy Michael Baney and Jeremy Michael Baney
Respondent:
John Palakovich and Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Berkheimer v. Palakovich et al
as 3:2008cv00709
Petitioner:
Joshua Berkheimer
Respondent:
John Palakovich and Thomas Corbett, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
King v. Palakovich
as 3:2007cv02327
Petitioner:
John King
Respondent:
John Palakovich and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Palakovich et al
as 1:2007cv02190
Plaintiff:
John Diaz
Defendant:
John Palakovich, Peggy Everhart, Lisa Hollibaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wideman v. Beard et al
as 3:2007cv02077
Petitioner:
Steven Wideman
Respondent:
Jeffrey A Beard, John Palakovich and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
