Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Dennis Weaver, Sr. v. John Palakovich
as 08-2947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS LEE WEAVER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTY GEN PA, Thomas Corbett, DA PERRY, Charles F. Chenot, III and JOHN PALAKOVICH
MEENAN v. PALAKOVICH et al
as 2:2008cv02950
Petitioner:
THOMAS MEENAN
Respondent:
JOHN PALAKOVICH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In re: Frederick Sisnero
as 08-2204
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
FREDERICK C. SISNEROS
Defendant:
JOHN PALAKOVICH, ATTY GEN PA and DA LANCASTER
Berkheimer v. Palakovich et al
as 3:2008cv00709
Petitioner:
Joshua Berkheimer
Respondent:
John Palakovich and Thomas Corbett, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bruce Ferrell v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 08-2100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE FERRELL
Defendant - Non-Participating:
JEFFREY BEARD, JAMES ECKARD, VICKY KORMANIC and others
Bruce Ferrell v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 08-2102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE FERRELL
Defendant - Non-Participating:
JEFFREY BEARD, SUZANNE HUESTON, KORMANIC and others
Bruce Ferrell v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 08-2101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE FERRELL
Defendant - Non-Participating:
JEFFREY BEARD, JAMES ECKARD, JAMES FOUSE and others
Anthony DeFranco v. William Wolfe, et al
as 08-1957
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY DEFRANCO
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BARR, JEFFREY BEARD, MARILYN BROOKS and others
Defendant:
JOHN PALAKOVICH, FRANZ BAUER, GEORGE WEAVER and others
King v. Palakovich
as 3:2007cv02327
Petitioner:
John King
Respondent:
John Palakovich and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Palakovich et al
as 1:2007cv02190
Plaintiff:
John Diaz
Defendant:
John Palakovich, Peggy Everhart, Lisa Hollibaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
