Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00194
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00295
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00072
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
John Futch v. USA
as 16-12131
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: John Futch
as 15-12921
Petitioner: In re: JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: John Futch
as 15-11252
Petitioner: In re: JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Mandamus Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John Futch v. USA
as 15-10360
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: John Futch
as 14-14955
Petitioner: In re: JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Mandamus Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dunn et al v. Takata Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv24009
Plaintiff: Craig Dunn, Pam Koehler, Zulemarie Rivera and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Dorry Taylor
Defendant: Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc., Highland Industries, Inc. and others
Consolidated Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc., The Hertz Corporation and Chrysler Group LLC
Claimant: John Randall Futch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv02371
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?