Cases 1 - 10 of 860
Demos v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Spokane
as 25-2534
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SPOKANE
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Demos v. Haynes
as 2:2025cv00561
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Ferguson et al
as 3:2025cv05266
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Robert Ferguson, Nicholas Brown, Ronald Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Trump et al
as 3:2025cv05249
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Donald J Trump, JD Vance, John G Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Ewing et al
as 2:2025cv00413
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Steve Ewing, Lisa Anderson, Jack Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Simpson, et al.
as 25-802
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant:
SIMPSON, Doctor, Twin Rivers Unit, DAVID CHRISTENSEN, Psychology Associate, Twin Rivers Unit, JOHN DOE(S), Medical Supervisor, Twin Rivers Unit; Medical Director, DOC Headquarters; Chief Psychiatrist, Twin Rivers Unit; Chief Psychologist, Twin Rivers Unit and others
Demos v. Strange, et al.
as 25-706
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant:
CHERYL STRANGE, DOC Secretary, JAY INSLEE, GOVERNOR, Governor, JOHN DOE, DOC Medical Supervisor & Chief of Operations; DOC Medical Transport Scheduler; Chief Seattle Police Department; and others
Demos v. Washington Department of Corrections, et al.
as 25-516
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant:
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JANET NELSON
Demos v. Gonzalez, et al.
as 24-7417
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant:
JULIE MARTIN, SEAN MCVAY, JANET NELSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
