Cases 1 - 10 of 835
Demos v. Washington State Attorney General
as 2:2024cv00876
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Washington State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Demos v. Washington State Attorney General
as 2:2024cv00721
Respondent:
Washington State Attorney General
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Demos v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2279
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DONALD J. TRUMP
Demos v. Bayer, et al.
as 24-828
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant:
DANIEL BAYER, Shift Lt, WSP, JENNIFER ADAMS, P.R.E.A. Liason, WSP, M. MORENO, Major Hearings Officer, WSP and others
Demos, John Robert v. Trump
as 9:2024cv80169
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00203
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America and Donald J Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-680
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHERYL STRANGE, ROBERT FERGUSON, BRAD BOWMAN and others
Demos v. State of Washington
as 24-676
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Demos v. Washington Department of Corrections, et al.
as 24-414
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS and Abner Edras Maiominides
Defendant / Appellee:
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHERYL STRANGE, ROBERT JACKSON, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary and others
Demos v. Trump
as 5:2024cv03011
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
