Cases 41 - 50 of 526
Demos v. Scalise
as 2:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Steve Scalise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. McCarthy
as 2:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Kevin J McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Demos v Jackson
as 4:2023cv05020
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
Robert M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Demos v. Jackson
as 2:2023cv00057
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Robert M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. State Supreme Court of Washington
as 3:2023cv05014
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
State Supreme Court of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
John Demos, Jr. v. State Supreme Court of Washington
as 23-35134
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON
Demos v. Pierce et al
as 4:2023cv05022
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Gary Pierce, Jennifer Adams, B Rohan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Demos, Jr. v. USDC-WAESP
as 23-70032
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr., ROBERT J. MCNICHOLS, JUSTIN L. QUACKENBUSH and others
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SPOKANE
Demos v. Pierce et al
as 3:2023cv05070
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Gary Pierce, Jennifer Adams, B Rohan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Demos, Jr. v. Jeffrey Immett, et al
as 23-35084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY IMMETT, CEO General Electric Company, DOUG MCMILLON, CEO Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and JOHN WATSON, CEO Chevron Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
