Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Demos v. Judd et al
as 1:2014cv00590
Defendant:
Frederick Banks, Keith Russell Judd, Amanda Levy and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis et al v. Danzig et al
as 1:2014cv00534
Defendant:
Austin Police Dept. and Glenn Danzig
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos and Roman Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Putin et al
as 1:2014cv00535
Defendant:
Shamil Basayev, Aleksandr Kerensky, Tsar Nicholas LNU and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos and Roman Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis al v. Judd et al
as 1:2014cv00538
Defendant:
Frederick Banks, Keith Russell Judd, Amanda Levy and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos and Roman Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Putin et al
as 1:2014cv00591
Defendant:
Shamil Basayev, Aleksandr Kerensky, Tsar Nicholas LNU and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Driscoll v. Hudspeth et al
as 4:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
John Robert Driscoll
Respondent:
Monty Hudspeth , Tawana Smith and Susan Dostal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv05040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Batiste v. McNabb et al
as 3:2013cv04800
Plaintiff:
Linda Batiste
Defendant:
John Robert McNabb , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Waldman v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv00107
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
John Robert Waldman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Demos v. CIA Director et al
as 3:2013cv00128
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
CIA Director, Governor of Texas and U.S. Secretary of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
