Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Wells v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Oregon Department of Corrections, DSG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsend v. McShane
as 3:2021cv01808
Petitioner:
Henry Alexander Townsend
Defendant:
Michael J. McShane, Ortega, Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. U.S. et al
as 3:2019cv01530
Defendant:
U.S., State of Oregon, State of Washington and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. Attorney General of the State of Washington et al
as 3:2019cv01529
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Washington, Governor Of The State Of Oregon and Governor of the State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00081
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Demos v. United States et al
as 3:2012cv00999
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
State of Washington and United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01163
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rochester v. Holder et al
as 6:2011cv00616
Defendant:
Michael L. Abston, J. Aldrick, Tamara L. Baxter and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendenhall v. Williams et al
as 6:2008cv00912
Plaintiff:
John Robert Mendenhall
Defendant:
Max Williams, Darrel Ruthren and Brian Belleque
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. USA et al
as 3:2008cv00309
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
USA, State of Washington and Territory of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
