Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Demos v. Washington Territory
as 2:2023cv00209
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Washington Territory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sink et al v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv00171
Petitioner:
John Robert Sink, Jr and Diane Marie Sink
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Demos v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2019cv00003
Respondent:
United States Senate Majority Leader, United States of America President, United States Attorney General and others
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos et al v. Reynolds American Inc et al
as 2:2016cv00287
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos and Society of T.R.U.T.H.
Defendant:
Reynolds American Inc, Phillip Morris Intl Inc, Lorillard Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Demos v. United States Secretary of State et al
as 2:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
United States Secretary of Defense, United States Secretary of State and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Demos v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv00158
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv00115
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America and State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brumbaugh v. Roberts et al
as 2:2011cv00277
Defendant:
John Roberts, Ruth Bader Ginzburg, Stephen Bryer and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dwayne Brumbaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Demos v. Washington Attorney General
as 2:2010cv00038
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Washington Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
