Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Barker v. Muskingum County Jail et al
as 2:2021cv04987
Plaintiff:
Dustin Edwin Barker, DeAngelo Dewon Tellis, Jamie Lee Mayle and others
Defendant:
Muskingum County Jail, Muskingum County Sheriff's Office, Muskingum County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. Kraft Foods Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02833
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Kraft Foods Inc., Dole Food Co. Inc., Yum Brands Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv02813
Plaintiff:
John Robert Day
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Demos et al v. Proctor & Gamble
as 1:2015cv00620
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos and Society of T.R.U.T.H.
Defendant:
Proctor & Gamble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02123
Plaintiff:
John Robert Young
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Konwinski v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv00641
Plaintiff:
John Robert Konwinski
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv00329
Plaintiff:
John Roberts
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mitchell v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp21303
Plaintiff:
John Robert Mitchell
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv01056
Plaintiff:
Judy Johnson and John Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
