Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Black Lives Matter D.C., et al v. William Barr, et al
as 22-5139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Black Lives Matter D.C., Toni Sanders, J.N.C., through his mother Demetria Bright and others
Defendant / Appellee:
William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States, Mark Adamchik, Cara Seiberling and others
CRABB v. JOHN POE ACPD OFFICERS 15 et al
as 1:2021cv01269
Not Classified By Court:
OFFICER JOHN POE 2, OFFICER JOHN ROE 4, OFFICER JOHN DOE 4 and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Crabb
Defendant:
JOHN POE ACPD OFFICERS 15, JOHN DOE PARK POLICE OFFICERS 15 and JOHN ROE MPD OFFICERS 15
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Kaul, et al v. Federation of State Medical B, et al
as 21-7043
Defendant / Appellee:
Geico Indemnity, American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians, Robert Garrett and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Arjun Kaul, M.D. and Arnold Erwin Feldman, M.D.
Richard Kaul, et al v. Federation of State Medical B, et al
as 20-7120
Defendant / Appellee:
Geico Indemnity, American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians, Robert Garrett and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Arjun Kaul, M.D. and Arnold Erwin Feldman, M.D.
DOE v. COURT SERVICES & OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY et al
as 1:2009cv01196
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE and JOHN DOE
Defendant:
COURT SERVICES & OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY, COURT SERVICES & OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY, COURT SERVICES & OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
MATHIS et al v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2007cv01155
Plaintiff:
KEITH MATHIS, REON HOLLOWAY, DAVID ROGERS and others
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
