Cases 31 - 40 of 103
Richardson v. Rathman
as 1:2013cv01346
Petitioner:
Watkins Richardson
Respondent:
John T Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Boykin v. Rathman
as 1:2013cv01106
Petitioner:
Doncey Frank Boykin
Respondent:
John T Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garner v. Rathman et al
as 2:2013cv00955
Petitioner:
Tony J Garner
Respondent:
John T Rathman and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Rathman et al
as 2:2013cv00775
Petitioner:
John Coleman, III
Respondent:
John T Rathman and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Summers v. Rathman
as 1:2013cv00640
Petitioner:
Lavar Summers
Respondent:
John T. Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Eddy v. Rathman et al
as 3:2013cv08011
Petitioner:
Melvin Buford Eddy
Respondent:
John T. Rathman and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Isaac v. Burns et al
as 2:2013cv00550
Plaintiff:
Prince Isaac
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Steven Burns, James Preston, Honorio Delacruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv00540
Plaintiff:
Delfino Gonzalez Sanchez
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, John T Rathman and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Santiago-Lugo v. Rathman
as 1:2013cv00045
Petitioner:
Israel Santiago-Lugo
Respondent:
John T. Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pinckney v. Rathman
as 1:2012cv04086
Petitioner:
Richard L Pinckney
Respondent:
John T Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
