Cases 41 - 50 of 192
Ford v. Ester et al
as 1:2012cv03269
Petitioner:
Jeffery C. Ford
Respondent:
Kurt Ester and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winbush v. Faulk, et al
as 12-1470
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL GLENN WINBUSH
Respondent - Appellee:
FAULK, actually named as Warden Faulk, Warden of Sterling Corr. Fac. and JOHN W. SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Ventura v. Faulk et al
as 1:2012cv02916
Petitioner:
Victor M. Ventura
Respondent:
James Faulk and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Villa v. Department Correction Co. D.O.C. et al
as 1:2012cv02804
Petitioner:
Reynaldo Y. Villa
Respondent:
Department Correction Co. D.O.C., John W. Suthers and James Faulker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Fauclk et al
as 1:2012cv02269
Petitioner:
Antonio Dwan Williams
Respondent:
Fauclk, State of Colorado, The and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stevenson v. Timme et al
as 1:2012cv02175
Petitioner:
William Stevenson
Respondent:
Rae Timme and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Biecker et al
as 1:2012cv02151
Petitioner:
Stevie Brown
Respondent:
James Biecker and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2012cv02097
Plaintiff:
Darrell K. Scott
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Bill Ritter, John W. Suthers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cary v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2012cv02072
Plaintiff:
Arnold A. Cary
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Bill Ritter, John W. Suthers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucero v. Medina et al
as 1:2012cv01919
Petitioner:
Anthony J. Lucero
Respondent:
Angel Medina and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
