Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Sanchez v. Womble et al
as 1:2015cv00210
Plaintiff:
John P Sanchez
Defendant:
John Womble and Surapaneni Prasad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Womble et al
as 1:2015cv00215
Plaintiff:
John P Sanchez
Defendant:
John Womble and Surapaneni Prasad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Prejean v. Daniels et al
as 1:2014cv00368
Plaintiff:
David J Prejean
Defendant:
Charles A Daniels, David Gonzales, Jr, Rebecca Nicholas Mallet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Womble et al
as 1:2014cv00242
Plaintiff:
John P Sanchez
Defendant:
John Womble, Sreedhar Polavarapu, University Texas Medical Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ferguson v. Womble et al
as 1:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Rashaad Ferguson
Defendant:
John Womble, Sreedhar Polavarapu, University of Texas Medical Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ballester v. Womble
as 1:2013cv00727
Plaintiff:
John Ballester
Defendant:
John Womble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spencer et al v. Womble et al
as 1:2013cv00689
Plaintiff:
Addones Spencer and John P Sanchez
Defendant:
John Womble, Sreedhar Polavarapu, University Texas Medical Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Fox et al
as 1:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
Elijah Jones, Jr
Defendant:
John B Fox, R Nichols, John Womble and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rios-Chavez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv00169
Plaintiff:
Victor Rios-Chavez
Defendant:
United States of America, R Martinez, L Melo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mayes v. United States Department of Justice FCI Beaumont Medium Prison Official et al
as 1:2012cv00231
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Mayes
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice FCI Beaumont Medium Prison Official, Troy Miller, Rick Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
