Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Castellon v. Hinkle et al
as 2:2020cv06420
Defendant:
Greg Hinkle and John or Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Estephen Castellon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Ervin et al
as 1:2020cv00441
Defendant:
Warden Ronald Erdos, Michael Ervin, JOHN AND JANE DOES (1-10) and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner v. John and Jane Does
as 2:2019cv04495
Defendant:
Michael Siewert, M. Riley, Deputy Blade and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Bonner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolliver v. Jefferies et al
as 2:2017cv00806
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Tolliver
Defendant:
Robert Jefferies, Abdul Rahman Shahid, Sunni Ali Islam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Warren County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2017cv00084
Plaintiff:
Bonita Stewart
Defendant:
Warren County Board of Commissioners, Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc., Mohammed Arif Baig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Eshett et al
as 2:2016cv00308
Plaintiff:
Sean Gilmore
Defendant:
Ukopan Eshett, Shandan Hicthins, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlisle v. Bauer et al
as 1:2016cv00259
Plaintiff:
Charlie L. Carlisle, III
Defendant:
William Bauer, Jeremy Eaches, Fiasol Ahmed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pighee v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv02697
Plaintiff:
Delano Pighee
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Charles Bradley, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Heyd et al
as 1:2015cv00151
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Hudson
Defendant:
T. Heyd, Chief Medical Officer, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Harlan, D.O. et al
as 2:2014cv01553
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin
Defendant:
Doctor Harlan, D.O., John and Jane Doe, Sgt. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
