Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Williams v. Davis et al
as 6:2017cv00104
Plaintiff:
Bruce D Williams
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Amanda Collins, Kevin Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caraway v. Emitt et al
as 4:2016cv03617
Plaintiff:
Robinson Edward Caraway
Defendant:
Ed Emitt, Ron Hickman, Sergeant Wolfford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. Patel
as 1:2016cv00210
Plaintiff:
Willie Randle
Defendant:
Pinkee Patel, James Johnson, David Hamel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Montoya et al
as 1:2015cv00196
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
FNU Montoya and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. Soto et al
as 5:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Marks Shelton
Defendant:
NFN Soto, R Hernandez, Brad C. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuft v. The State of Texas et al
as 6:2014cv00772
Plaintiff:
Robert Alexander Tuft
Defendant:
The State Of Texas, Vernon Pittman, Jeorld Braggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moon v. Chapa et al
as 3:2013cv00387
Defendant:
Rachel Chapa and John and Jane Does 1-10
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Plaintiff:
Travis D. Moon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lynn v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv04735
Plaintiff:
Sean Carey Lynn
Defendant:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID, Mr. Summers, Ms. Angie Ricks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redmond v. University of Texas Medical Branch Hospital Galveston et al
as 2:2013cv00268
Plaintiff:
Randell Joseph Redmond
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical Branch Hospital Galveston, Ahmad Masood, MD, Whitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koumjian v. Abbott et al
as 1:2012cv00244
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Lynn Linthicium, Brad Livingston and others
Plaintiff:
Paul James Koumjian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
