Cases 71 - 80 of 250
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00140
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Joyner et al v. Grenada County, MS
as 4:2019cv00027
Plaintiff:
Drew Joyner, Beverly Buonviri and Frank K. Joyner
Defendant:
Corrections Management Services, Inc. (CMS), Grenada County, Mississippi, John and Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00074
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe Persons, Entities 1 through 10 and G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Mason v. The City of Macon et al
as 3:2019cv00066
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, The City of Macon and Buzz McGuire
Plaintiff:
Lucious Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00202
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Human Rights Defense Center v. Forrest County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2018cv00184
Defendant:
Forrest County, Mississippi, John and Jane Does 1-10 and Billy McGee
Plaintiff:
Human Rights Defense Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Harrison County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2018cv00322
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi, Correctional Medical Associates, Inc., John and Jane Does 1-24 and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
