Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Carruth v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv01294
Petitioner:
Terrence Carruth
Respondent:
John or Jane Doe and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cropper v. Palmer et al
as 3:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Andrew David Cropper
Defendant:
Judge Emory Palmer, Herb Cranford, Jr., Azi Golshan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fiorito v. Martin et al
as 1:2021cv03802
Plaintiff:
Michael Fiorito
Defendant:
Dr. Martin, The United States, A. W. Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wright v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00033
Plaintiff:
Leroy C Wright
Defendant:
Nurse Joy, Ms. Bailey, Ms. Crosser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. John and Jane Doe
as 1:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lewis
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridley et al v. Warren
as 1:2019cv04737
Plaintiff:
Edward T. Ridley and John and Jane Doe Inmates
Defendant:
Neil Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs v. Fannin County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2019cv00024
Defendant:
Dane Kirby, B. Alison Sosebee, Donna Whitener and others
Plaintiff:
William Christopher Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bourassa v. Dozier et al
as 1:2018cv01082
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Alan Bourassa
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Jackson et al
as 1:2018cv01080
Plaintiff:
Troy Barber
Defendant:
Theodore Jackson, Owono Awono, Officer Brenton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince et al v. Georgia Department of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2017cv02687
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tiger D. Prince, Timothy Adams, Nick R. Smith and others
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Pardons and Paroles, Stan Shepard, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
