Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Chandler v. Prisons et al
as 2:2010cv01587
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr
Defendant:
U S Bureau of Prisons and J Micieli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chandler v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2010cv01105
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, J P Young, G Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chandler v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2010cv00553
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, J Micieli and G Moldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chandler v. Stephens et al
as 1:2009cv01910
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr
Defendant:
S Stephens and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Chandler v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2009cv01902
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, G Maldonado, D Bracy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Chandler v. Young
as 2:2009cv01810
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr
Defendant:
J P Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chandler v. Moorehead
as 2:2009cv01801
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr
Defendant:
Barbara Moorehead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2009cv01572
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, J P Young, Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Young et al
as 1:2009cv01529
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr
Defendant:
J P Young and G Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chandler v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2009cv00622
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
