Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Adams et al v. BRG Sports, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv08544
Defendant:
BRG Sports, Inc. and Riddell Inc
Plaintiff:
Mark Adams , Cory Brandon , John Camperlino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. The National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as 1:2017cv03973
Plaintiff:
Johnny Williams
Defendant:
The National Collegiate Athletic Association and Sun Belt Conference
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv08758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ford et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv50135
Plaintiff:
Johnny William Ford and Johnny William Ford, Jr.
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv10322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Williams v. Kaplan Higher Education et al
as 1:2012cv10328
Plaintiff:
Johnny Williams
Defendant:
Kaplan Higher Education, Jaime Cucoy and Jeremy Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Thomas et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2011cv00792
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas, Jeremy White, Joseph Mueller and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Lane v. United States of America
as 4:2011cv04024
Petitioner:
Johnny William Lane
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
