Cases 21 - 30 of 4,210
DOE v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
as 1:2024cv00892
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
HAFEZ v. VIDINO et al
as 1:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
FARID HAFEZ
Defendant:
LORENZO VIDINO, GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, PROGRAM FOR EXTREMISM AT THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DRAPER v. BIDEN
as 1:2024cv00884
Plaintiff:
LORETTA HILLWARE
Defendant:
JOHN BEAIRD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DOE v. PUBLIC COMPANY ACCOUNTING OVERSIGHT BOARD
as 1:2024cv00780
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
PUBLIC COMPANY ACCOUNTING OVERSIGHT BOARD and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GUL v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
RUBINA GUL
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, CONRAD TRIBBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
v. SOPKIN et al
as 1:2024cv00743
Not Yet Classified:
BARBARA SOPKIN and JOHN LOPATTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
ZEATH et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
KAMAL ZEATH, FATHIMA RASHFA RAHMAN and ZIDAN AHMED ZEATH
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, BAXTER HUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HOSUR v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
POOVI RAVINDRA HOSUR
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, PATRICIA A. LACINA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
DAVIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL DAVIS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, EMMANUEL AGBARA, INNOCENT OPARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
