Cases 1 - 10 of 127
Leach v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J Leach
Defendant:
Cynthia Smith, Carrie Bridges and John Masquelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Barnett
Defendant:
Cynthia Smith, Carrie Bridges and John Masquelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heavener v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
John E Heavener
Defendant:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jolliff v. Rogers County Sheriff's Department, The et al
as 4:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kathy Jolliff
Defendant:
Rogers County Sheriff's Department, The, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Demos v. Trump
as 4:2024cv00011
Defendant:
John Robert Demos and Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanwoudenberg v. Harvanek
as 4:2023cv00321
Petitioner:
Edward John Vanwoudenberg
Respondent:
Kameron Harvanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Tjeerdsma et al
as 4:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Ra'Terrius King
Defendant:
John Tjeerdsma, Jeffery Gatwood, Tulsa County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Defendant:
B Keener, J Faircloth, Tulsa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Perez Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Parris et al
as 4:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Mitchell
Defendant:
John Everett Parris, Rachel Marie Dallis, Jeffery Bryant Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCalister v. Owens et al
as 4:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
Michael Leon McCalister
Defendant:
Scotty Owens, John Copeland, James Pendelgraft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
