Cases 1 - 10 of 19
David Wattleton v. BOP
as 22-5180
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John or Jane Doe, Director
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams, et al
as 22-5056
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant / Appellee:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
GORBEY v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OWL FEATHER GORBEY
Defendant:
WILLIAMS, FORREN, CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LECROY v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv02481
Defendant:
T.J. WATSON, RADM CHRIS A. BINA, JEFFREY E. KRUEGER and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LECROY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
H.U.C.U. et al v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv01964
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, JOHN C SANDERS, JONATHAN HAYES and others
Plaintiff:
M.G.B.V., H.U.C.U. and G.M.C.B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCCLURE v. TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2019cv00117
Defendant:
TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL, KEN PAXTON, JENNIFER THARP and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT T. MCCLURE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darnell Stanley v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr., et al
as 13-5326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darnell Stanley
Defendant - Appellee:
Isaac Fulwood, Jr., Chairman, United States Parole Commission, Lynne Jenkins, Hearing Examiner and others
FLOREZ v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv00991
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND FLOREZ
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., CRAIG APKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STANLEY v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2013cv00430
Plaintiff:
DARNELL STANLEY
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, LYNNE E. JENKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ronald Anderson v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr., et al
as 10-5086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald Anderson
Defendant - Appellee:
Isaac Fulwood, Jr., Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission, Sandra G. Hylton, Hearing Examiner and John and Jane Does
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
