Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Pierce v. Zantac Corporation et al
as 9:2023cv81121
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Pierce
Defendant:
Zantac Corporation, Family Dollar, Sanofi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Cerreta v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc.
as 3:2021cv00982
Plaintiff:
Peter Cerreta
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tangarife v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv20500
Plaintiff:
Adriana Tangarife
Defendant:
Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc., Vivian Reingeheim and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bacon County, Georgia v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 5:2018cv00069
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bacon County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce County, Georgia v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 5:2018cv00068
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Pierce County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Prunty v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00105
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Prunty, Jr
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc., Jannsen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol Myers-Squibb, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
