Cases 61 - 70 of 171
Ogg v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv03797
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Ogg
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rose et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv03796
Plaintiff:
Ora Rose and Preston Rose
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baltierrez v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv03806
Plaintiff:
Margarita Baltierrez
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv03793
Plaintiff:
Patricia Miller
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. , Coloplast A/S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stokely et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv03801
Plaintiff:
Debra Stokely and Joseph Stokely
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sparks et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv03800
Plaintiff:
Glenda Sparks and Charles M. Sparks
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Godfrey v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv03721
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Godfrey
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reed v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv03554
Plaintiff:
Gail Reed
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ogden v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv03549
Plaintiff:
Sharon Ogden
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bain v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv03555
Plaintiff:
Cindy Bain
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
