Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01498
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bruce v. Galley et al
as 8:2007cv01071
Petitioner:
Dante Bruce
Respondent:
Jon P. Galley and The Attorney General for the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rush v. Galley et al
as 1:2007cv00524
Petitioner:
Clifford Rush
Respondent:
Jon P. Galley, The Attorney General of the State of Maryland and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fulford-El v. Zang et al
as 1:2007cv00490
Plaintiff:
Errol Douglass Fulford-El
Defendant:
Zane, Northcraft, Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2007cv00403
Plaintiff:
David S. Johnson
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr., Robert M. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Galley
as 8:2007cv00342
Plaintiff:
Kevin Johnson
Defendant:
Jon P. Galley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Femi et al
as 1:2007cv00272
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Cooper
Defendant:
Femi, Johnson, McDowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lurz v. Galley et al
as 1:2007cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jay Timothy Lurz
Defendant:
Jon P. Galley, Isaias Tessema, Isaias Tessema and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lurz v. Galley et al
as 1:2007cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jay Timothy Lurz
Defendant:
Jon P. Galley, Jon P. Galley, C.E. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lurz v. Galley et al
as 1:2007cv00073
Plaintiff:
Jay Timothy Lurz
Defendant:
Jon P. Galley, L. Whiteman, Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
