Cases 11 - 20 of 854
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JONES v. JUDICIAL BRANCH OF U.S. GOVERNMENT
as 1:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
JUDICIAL BRANCH OF U.S. GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
JONES v. CENTRAL DISTRICT STATION
as 1:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
CENTRAL DISTRICT STATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GONZALES v. JONES et al
as 1:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
FRED GONZALES
Defendant:
RASHIDA JONES, MARK THOMPSON, SUZANNE SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
JAMES JONES
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and CURTIS CRISTE
Rozina Muthoka v. USA, et al
as 23-5298
Plaintiff:
Rozina Kimani Muthoka, In Re Executer of; In her sovereign immunity capacity, also known as Rozina Rhonda Jones Williams
Defendant:
United States of America, Union States, Missouri State and others
Tobias Jones v. United States Secret Service, et al
as 23-5288
Plaintiff:
Tobias Jones
Defendant:
United States Secret Service, of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, James Fisher, Officer and Holland, Sergeant; all individuals being sued in their individual and official capacity
JONES v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv03627
Plaintiff:
HELEN M. JONES
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
JONES v. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv03576
Plaintiff:
JULIANNE JONES
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
ADAMKAVICIUS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv03571
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ADAMKAVICIUS, JOYCE MEHRER, KEVIN MEHRER and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
