Cases 21 - 30 of 2,853
Bowman v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv01299
Plaintiff:
Erick Dawayne Bowman
Defendant:
Medical Nurse Dr. Jones, Willie Wilson and Rutledge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv01300
Plaintiff:
Byron T Arnold
Defendant:
Joshua Jones, Sword and McGhee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Byron T Arnold
Defendant:
Joshua Jones, Sword and McGhee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONYERS v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CONYERS
Defendant:
WARDEN T JESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN GRAHAM, CAPTAIN HAMILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jones v. Camelia
as 1:2024cv01139
Plaintiff:
Nakita Jones
Defendant:
Jennifer Camelia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Jones v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01122
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Jones and Assistant Chief Diane Jones
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Colston v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Bobby Jones Colston
Respondent:
Sheriff Babb and Warden Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
