Cases 31 - 40 of 632
CITY OF SOUTHFIELD FIRE AND POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. HAYWARD HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv04146
Plaintiff:
CITY OF SOUTHFIELD FIRE AND POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant:
HAYWARD HOLDINGS, INC., KEVIN HOLLERAN, EIFION JONES and others
Wilmington Food Not Bombs et al v. Jennings et al
as 1:2023cv00736
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Food Not Bombs, Madison Daley and George Jones
Defendant:
Kathy Jennings and City of Wilmington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawrence v. Arconic Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00720
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Arconic Corporation, Frederick A. Henderson, William F. Austen and others
GOODLIN v. ROSE et al
as 2:2023cv02304
Plaintiff:
HERBERT SETH GOODLIN
Defendant:
ALEX ROSE, delaware county daily times, FOLCROFT BOROUGH DETECTIVE CORPORAL DANIEL E. WHITE, OFFICIALLY AND IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CUBBY, ESQ. v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2023cv02842
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. CUBBY, ESQ.
Defendant:
CITY OF PATERSON, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COUNTY OF PASSAIC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JONES v. TRANS UNION, LLC, in its own name and et al
as 2:2023cv01892
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY JONES
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC and TRANS UNION RENTAL SCREENING SOLUTIONS, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jones v. Univar Solutions Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
Univar Solutions Inc., Christopher D. Pappas, David Jukes and others
Jones v. Sumo Logic, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
Sumo Logic, Inc., Joseph Ansanelli, Christian Beedgen and others
Jones v. NuVasive, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Defendant:
NuVasive, Inc., J. Christopher Barry, Amy Belt Raimundo and others
USA v. Matt Jones
as 23-1558
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MATT JONES, aka Mack Jones
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
