Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,846
Jones v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01122
Plaintiff: Stephanie Jones and Assistant Chief Diane Jones
Defendant: Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Colston v. Babb
as 4:2024cv00073
Petitioner: Bobby Jones Colston
Respondent: Sheriff Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rice v. Jones
as 4:2024cv00074
Plaintiff: Jonathan Rice
Defendant: Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colston v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00054
Petitioner: Bobby Jones Colston
Respondent: Sheriff Babb and Warden Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00912
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GREEN v. JEFFERSON et al
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff: TYRONE GREEN
Defendant: DEPUTY WARDEN JEFFERSON, DEPUTY WARDEN JONES, DEPUTY WARDEN McDaniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. MCDANIEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff: ORLANDO SMITH
Defendant: DEPUTY WARDEN MCDANIEL, DEPUTY WARDEN JONES, FULLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00064
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones v. Rogers State Prison et al
as 6:2024cv00007
Plaintiff: Shaun Jones
Defendant: Rogers State Prison and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?