Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jorge Ernesto Ramirez Ceballos v. Banda Maguey Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv10911
Plaintiff:
Jorge Ernesto Ramirez Ceballos
Defendant:
Banda Maguey Corporation doing business as Banda Maguey USA, Inc., Miguel Angel Vidal Pulido, Samuel Vidal Pulido and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Abimael Enrique Corea Lopez et al v. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv09080
Plaintiff:
Abimael Enrique Corea Lopez, Adan Edilber Cuadra Mejia, Adolfo Bladimiro Flores Cruz and others
Defendant:
Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv05575
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jesus Jorge Flores-Ramirez v. Three Unk. Federal Task-Force Agents et al
as 2:2017cv02360
Plaintiff:
Jesus Jorge Flores-Ramirez
Defendant:
One Unk. Federal Task-Force Supervisor and Unknown Federal Task Force Agency
One Identified As Manny And One As UM In Trascript:
Three Unk. Federal Task-Force Agents
Sanchez-Ramirez v. USA
as 3:2013cv03010
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jorge Sanchez-Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ponce v. USA
as 3:2012cv02381
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jorge Alberto Ramirez Ponce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Gilbert Lerma v. Stylistics Los Angeles Car Club Inc et al
as 2:2012cv06704
Defendant:
Does, Jorge Luis Ramirez and Stylistics Los Angeles Car Club Inc
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Lerma, Jr
Jose Saul Padilla et al v. Dole Food Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00194
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ramirez Aguilar, Juan Carlos Reyes Amaya, Lucio Lazaro Reyes Amaya and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Brands Company, North America, Chiquita Brands International, Inc., Chiquita Brands, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
