Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Hernandez Diaz et al v. C.R. England, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Ramirez, Roberto Hernandez Diaz, Rosa Basilia Ramirez and others
Defendant:
C.R. England, Inc. and Tyrio Islaam Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Williams v. Valdez, et al.
as 5:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
L.T. Mike Valdez and Jorge Perez Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez-Saravia v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00149
Petitioner:
Jorge Javier Ramirez-Saravia
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.221 ACRE OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2021cv00004
Defendant:
Herminia R. Contreras, Anthony L. Lovato, Jr., Arturo Ramirez and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
USA v. Jorge Montemayor-Ramirez
as 17-41255
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE ARMANDO MONTEMAYOR-RAMIREZ, also known as Jorge Armando Ramirez-Montemayor, also known as Jorge A. Montemayor, also known as Jorge A. Montemayor-Ramirez
Jorge Ramirez v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-20283
Petitioner - Appellant:
JORGE ALBERTO RAMIREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
USA v. Jorge Ramirez-Montoya
as 16-40129
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE LUIS RAMIREZ-MONTOYA
USA v. Jorge Ramirez-Montoya
as 16-40128
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE LUIS RAMIREZ-MONTOYA
Jorge Ramirez v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-60777
Petitioner:
JORGE SANCHEZ RAMIREZ
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Jorge Ramirez
as 14-40885
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE LUIS RAMIREZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
